Attachment Theory and Its Influence on Child Development: Foundations, Evidence, and Implications

Attachment Theory and Its Influence on Child Development: Foundations, Evidence, and Implications

Introduction

Attachment theory, initially conceptualised by John Bowlby, offers a comprehensive framework for understanding the lasting emotional bonds that develop between individuals, especially between infants and their primary caregivers. This theoretical approach suggests that humans have an innate psychobiological system that drives them to seek proximity to important others, particularly in times of need or danger, to ensure safety and survival.

Over the years, attachment theory has significantly influenced developmental psychology, shaping both research and clinical practice by clarifying the developmental pathways of personality and the formation of close relationships.

“The foundational principles have been expanded and refined by researchers like Mary Ainsworth, assessing how various attachment styles influence socioemotional, cognitive, and behavioural outcomes across the lifespan”.

Foundations of Attachment Theory

Origins and Historical Context

John Bowlby developed attachment theory in the mid-20th century, drawing on ethology, cybernetics, developmental psychology, and psychoanalysis. His early observations emphasised the harmful effects of maternal deprivation, prompting him to challenge dominant psychoanalytic ideas.

Bowlby suggested that infants seek proximity for protection, rooted in evolutionary biology, providing a secure base from which to explore and a safe haven to return to.

John Bowlby
John Bowlby (1907–1990)

Internal Working Models (IWM)

An IWM is a cognitive-affective framework regarding oneself and others based on early caregiving. These models serve as an internal guidance system, filtering social interactions and guiding behaviour. Although formed early, they are 'working' models because they can develop through later experiences.

Attachment Behaviours Crying, smiling, clinging, and following to maintain closeness.
Caregiver Role Reliability and responsiveness foster trust and safety.
 

The Four Attachment Styles

Classification developed through the "Strange Situation" procedure.

Secure

Uses caregiver as a secure base. Trust in responsiveness and availability.

Ambivalent

Distress on separation; seeking yet resisting contact upon reunion.

Avoidant

Indifferent to caregiver presence; actively avoids contact when reunited.

Disorganised

Lack of coherent strategy; conflicting behaviours like freezing.

Impact on Development

Socioemotional Outcomes

Secure attachment is essential for mental health. Children develop better personalities and positive relationships, whereas insecure patterns link to regulation difficulties and externalising behaviours.

Cognitive & Behavioural

Secure children show better problem-solving and persistence. Conversely, socially indiscriminate behaviours in institutional settings link to later aggression.

Contemporary Applications

Attachment theory is vital in UK educational and clinical settings. It helps teachers interpret behaviour and build supportive environments. Clinically, interventions like VIPP-SD and ABC have proven effective in improving caregiver sensitivity and child security.

Conclusion

From Bowlby's insights to Ainsworth’s classifications, the theory integrates findings from neuroscience and practice. Continued research into cultural differences and genetic-environmental interactions will further deepen our understanding of this fundamental experience.

Written By

Mark Else

My experience ranges from running playgroups for pre-schoolers to managing complex safeguarding caseloads within both mainstream and SEMH provisions. In addition to having worked within the education sector since 2018, I am currently studying for a Level 6 Youth Work degree.

References

  • Buehler, S. (2017) “Handbook of Attachment, Third Edition: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications,” Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. Informa UK Limited. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2017.1317533 .
  • Belsky, J. (2002) “Developmental origins of attachment styles,” Attachment & Human Development. Informa UK Limited. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730210157510.
  • Li, Y. (2023) “How does attachment style influence early childhood development,” Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences. Darcy & Roy Press Co. Ltd. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4675.
  • Trowell, J. (2008) “Understanding Attachment and Attachment Disorders. Theory, Evidence and Practice. By Vivien Prior & Danya Glaser. Jessica Kingsley. 2006. 288pp. £19.99 (pb). ISBN 9781843102458,” British Journal of Psychiatry. Royal College of Psychiatrists. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.106.032466.
  • Facompré, C.R., Bernard, K. and Waters, T.E.A. (2017) “Effectiveness of interventions in preventing disorganized attachment: A meta-analysis,” Development and Psychopathology. Cambridge University Press (CUP). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579417000426.
  • Harlow, E. (2019) “Attachment theory: developments, debates and recent applications in social work, social care and education,” Journal of Social Work Practice. Informa UK Limited. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2019.1700493.
  • Stern, J.A. et al. (2018) “Developmental processes across the first two years of parenthood: Stability and change in adult attachment style.,” Developmental Psychology. American Psychological Association (APA). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000481.
  • O’Connor, T.G. and Gerard Byrne, J. (2007) “Attachment Measures for Research and Practice,” Child and Adolescent Mental Health. Wiley. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2007.00444.x.
  • Brumariu, L.E., Madigan, S., et al. (2018) “The Security Scale as a measure of attachment: meta-analytic evidence of validity,” Attachment & Human Development. Informa UK Limited. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2018.1433217.
  • Van IJzendoorn, M.H. et al. (2004) “Assessing Attachment Security With the Attachment                     Q                     Sort: Meta‐Analytic Evidence for the Validity of the Observer AQS,” Child Development. Wiley. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00733.x.
  • Strauss, B. et al. (2022) “Is there an elephant in the room? A study of convergences and divergences of adult attachment measures commonly used in clinical studies,” Psychotherapy Research. Informa UK Limited. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2021.2020930.
  • Gregory, M., Kannis‐dymand, L. and Sharman, R. (2020) “A review of attachment‐based parenting interventions: Recent advances and future considerations,” Australian Journal of Psychology. Informa UK Limited. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12270.
  • Groh, A.M. et al. (2016) “Attachment and Temperament in the Early Life Course: A Meta‐Analytic Review,” Child Development. Wiley. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12677.
  • Arguz Cildir, D. et al. (2019) “Association of prenatal attachment and early childhood emotional, behavioral, and developmental characteristics: A longitudinal study,” Infant Mental Health Journal. Wiley. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21822.
  • Lyons-Ruth, K. et al. (2009) “Socially indiscriminate attachment behavior in the Strange Situation: Convergent and discriminant validity in relation to caregiving risk, later behavior problems, and attachment insecurity,” Development and Psychopathology. Cambridge University Press (CUP). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579409000376.
  • van IJzendoorn, M.H. et al. (2022) “Improving parenting, child attachment, and externalizing behaviors: Meta-analysis of the first 25 randomized controlled trials on the effects of Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline,” Development and Psychopathology. Cambridge University Press (CUP). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579421001462.
  • Waters, T.E.A. et al. (2021) “An empirical test of prototype and revisionist models of attachment stability and change from middle childhood to adolescence: A 6‐year longitudinal study,” Child Development. Wiley. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13672.
  • Tucker-Drob, E.M. and Briley, D.A. (2014) “Continuity of genetic and environmental influences on cognition across the life span: A meta-analysis of longitudinal twin and adoption studies.,” Psychological Bulletin. American Psychological Association (APA). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035893.
  • Brumariu, L.E., Giuseppone, K.R., et al. (2018) “Middle Childhood Attachment Strategies: validation of an observational measure,” Attachment & Human Development. Informa UK Limited. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2018.1433696.
  • Zajac, L., Raby, K.L. and Dozier, M. (2019) “Sustained effects on attachment security in middle childhood: results from a randomized clinical trial of the Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch‐up (ABC) intervention,” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. Wiley. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13146.
  • Walter, I. et al. (2019) “*The efficacy of the attachment-based SAFE® prevention program: a randomized control trial including mothers and fathers,” Attachment & Human Development. Informa UK Limited. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2019.1582599.

Found this helpful?

Join our newsletter and recieve notification of new articles and guides when they have been published.